Volume 10, Number 2
Abstracts: Volume 10, Number 1
2005
RESEARCH
A Formative Evaluation of the Prairie Science Class

Julie (Athman) Ernst

Assistant Professor
Department of Health, Physical Education, and Recreation
University of Minnesota-Duluth
110 Sports and Health Center
1216 Ordean Court
Duluth, MN 55812-3032
jernst@d.umn.edu

Abstract
The Prairie Science Class is a formal partnership between the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s Prairie Wetlands Learning Center and the Fergus Falls Independent School District 544. Its mission is to use the local prairie wetlands ecosystem as an integrating and motivating context to engage fifth-grade students in science, math, and writing through real world, field-based learning experiences. A formative program evaluation was conducted during the first year of its implementation to document program outcomes and areas for program improvement. A variety of quantitative and qualitative evaluation tools were used. The results of this evaluation suggest positive cognitive and affective outcomes, including concept attainment and skill development in science and writing; perceived learning in math; perceived skill growth in problem solving, technology, and working and communicating with others; and positive influences on students’ motivation toward learning, attitudes toward the prairie wetlands environment, and stewardship ethic.



A Shared History?
Presenting Australia’s Post-Contact Indigenous Past


Bronwyn Batten
Post-graduate Research Student
Warawara – The Department of Indigenous Studies
Division of Society, Culture, Media and Philosophy
Macquarie University
NSW, Australia 2109
blawton@scmp.mq.edu.au

Abstract
The colonial origins of museums have often influenced the ways in which they depict the past. In Australia, portrayals of the Indigenous past have focussed exclusively on “traditional life” or the prehistoric period of history, to the detriment of post-contact history. This paper examines ways in which museums around Australia are beginning to counter this trend. Museum exhibits that relate to Australia’s shared, post-contact past are analyzed in the context of recent developments in museology. This analysis is combined with feedback generated from interviews with heritage professionals. The results suggest that in order to move towards inclusive interpretation of Australian history, multiple voices and perspectives of the past must be incorporated into interpretive programs. This paper argues that there are a variety of ways in which heritage interpreters can attempt to incorporate pluralist perspectives of the past into museum exhibits.
IN SHORT

Long-Term Recollections of an Environmental Interpretive Program

Doug Knapp, Ph.D.
Associate Professor
Department of Recreation and Park Administration
133 HPER
Indiana University
Bloomington, Indiana 47405
dknapp@indiana.edu

Gregory M. Benton, M.S.

Research Assistant
Department of Recreation and Park Administration
133 HPER
Indiana University
Bloomington, Indiana 47405
gbenton@indiana.edu

Introduction
Recent interpretive publications have noted the importance of memory and recall. In discussing cognitive effects of interpretation, Webb (2000) suggests that, “While learning is the input, memory is the output—we assess learning only through memory” (p. 22). Chawla (1998) notes that memory-related research associated with formal and informal events (such as interpretation) can provide rich information. “When it comes to the broad outline of life events and their significance, memory’s reputation fares much better [than other media]” (p. 387). In the textbook, Interpretation for the 21st Century, Beck & Cable (1998), suggest that interpreters’ first principle should be to not only relate information to the visitor but also help retain that information. “Effective interpretation produces external stimuli that trigger existing (cognitive) maps, thereby allowing the audience to get it and store the information in relation to other information they already possess” (p. 16). Although the field notes its importance, few studies have been conducted to assess long-term recollections of interpretive programs. Therefore, this project investigated aspects of an interpretive program that were recalled two years following the actual experience.


Partnerships in Education and Interpretation

Karyn McDermaid
Senior Research Specialist
karynk@uiuc.edu

Introduction
College natural resource programs have a challenge to provide students with a broad background of ecological theory and applied practices while also satisfying general education requirements. The study of natural resources is inherently broad, and our program of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign struggles to provide this balance to students. Opportunities for students to learn how to employ and apply ecological principles while managing natural resources are essential. However, it is often difficult for programs to provide these opportunities. Shrinking state dollars have resulted in substantial budget cuts, staff reductions, and unfilled faculty positions. Restrictions on the use of funds often make it difficult to fund non-traditional and/or new initiatives. Teaching field-based courses also presents a range of obstacles that inhibit faculty from devising such courses. The development and instruction of field-based courses consumes a disproportionate amount of time that is not always equally considered during tenure review. Instructors of such courses must also possess a unique skill set that differs from traditional classroom instruction. They must possess a mastery of the applied techniques being taught. Logistics such as site procurement and transport of students are time-consuming and often prohibiting, and normal class periods are not long enough to accommodate travel to a site.


A 20 Years Overview and Prospect of Graduate Interpretive Research in Taiwan: 1984-2003

Homer C. Wu, Ph.D.
Associate Professor
Graduate Institute of Environmental Education
National Taichung Teachers College
140, Min-Sheng Road
Taichung City, 40306, Taiwan, R.O.C.
hcwu@mail.ntctc.edu.tw

Wei-Li Jasmine Chen, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor
Graduate Institute of Environmental Planning and Design
MingDao University
369, Wen-Hua Road
Peetow, Changhua, 52345 Taiwan, R.O.C.

Abstract
The year 2004 represents a landmark for interpretive research in Taiwan—it has been 20 years since the completion of the first academic thesis examining the topic of interpretation in 1984. Fifty-six completed masters’ theses signal a boom in resource interpretation research. Within the past two decades, the scope of interpretive research has expanded from general to specific, from resource-based sites to diverse settings, and from a “service orientation” to “management tool orientation”. This analysis of interpretive research in Taiwan attempts to (1) compare and contrast what research topics related to interpretation and guiding have been conducted on “the other side of the world,” (2) understand the range of theories employed in the studies, (3) recognize how interpretation relates and contributes to the development of the leisure and recreation industry in Taiwan, and (4) highlight the potential long-term cumulative effect of interpretation to Taiwanese society as a whole.

IN MY OPINION

Exploring Evolved Psychological Underpinnings of Universal Concepts and Meaningful Connections

Daniel R. Tardona
College of Arts and Sciences
Department of Psychology
University of North Florida
4567 St. Johns Bluff Road, South
Jacksonville, Florida 32224-2645
Daniel_Tardona@nps.gov

An emerging field of study in the psychological sciences is looking deeper into many areas of human behavior from an evolutionary perspective. This paper explores how the promising field of evolutionary psychology is relevant to the field of interpretation. Research findings from evolutionary psychology may clarify the psychological underpinnings of meaningful connections humans make with some natural and cultural resources. Tilden (1977, p. 8) emphasized that interpretation “aims to reveal meanings and relationships.” Larsen (2001) states, “I believe that embracing the variety of meanings that audiences see in the resources we protect and manage is a critical strategy for preservation” (p.17). The meanings humans find relating to natural and cultural resources are shaped in a variety of ways including cultural, ethnic, and life experiences. It may also be true however, that some elements of natural and cultural resources are meaningful in some ways to all humans as a result of a shared evolutionary history with those resources. Professional interpreters continually seek to link tangible elements (such as structures, artifacts, biofacts, and land features) of a cultural or natural resource with intangible concepts (such as ideas or concepts) that reveal personal meaning. It is believed that the most powerful intangible concepts are universal because they provide the greatest opportunities for individuals among diverse audiences to find meaningful connections with the tangible elements of a resource. Stated differently, it is anticipated that all human beings find certain intangible concepts or ideas meaningful, hence are universal among human populations. Such concepts or ideas might include freedom, birth, death, survival, and family to mention only a few possibilities.