Journal
 
Submission Process
Advisory Board
Associate Editors
Contact
Subscription
Volume 12, Number 2
Volume 12, Number 1
Volume 11, Number 2
Volume 11, Number 1
Archive
Abstracts: Volume 11, Number 1
2006
RESEARCH
The Effect of Thematic Interpretation on a Child’s Knowledge of an Interpretive Program

Jennifer L. Tarlton
7303 Myrtle Ave
Eureka, CA 95503
(707) 443-4100
jennhaig@hotmail.com

Carolyn J. Ward
Associate Professor
Environmental and Natural Resource Department
Humboldt State University
(707) 826-5639
carolyn.ward@humboldt.edu

Abstract
In the field of interpretation, thematic interpretation is a widely accepted technique used to increase knowledge gain from interpretive programs with educational goals and objectives. Although the approach has theoretical grounding in cognitive psychology, social psychology, and persuasive communication, it has not been formally tested in a field interpretive setting. This study addressed this lack of empirical evidence by comparing children’s knowledge gained from a thematic versus a non-thematic interpretive program. It also compared type of knowledge gained by evaluating three different levels of learning: recognition, recall, and application.

The results supported the use of thematic interpretation and program construction. The thematic group not only showed a significant increase in ability to recall and apply information, but was also three times more likely to identify the theme and main points of the program, when compared with the non-thematic group. No differences between groups were found for the recognition measure. This indicated that thematic interpretation is effective at encouraging higher levels of thinking and learning and highlights the importance of matching correct evaluation measures with learning objectives. Further management and research implications are discussed.



The Impact of Normative Message Types on Off-Trail Hiking

Patricia L. Winter
Research Social Scientist
United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service
Pacific Southwest Research Station
4955 Canyon Crest Drive
Riverside, California, 92507
phone (951)680-1557
pwinter@fs.fed.us

Abstract
Depreciative activities and high annual visitation levels threaten the health and sustainability of the giant Sequoia. Signage is one route to managing visitor behavior. Research suggests a two-by-two conceptualization of normative messages in signs. Messages may present the “ought” (injunctive) or the “is” (descriptive) of behavior and may be stated positively (prescriptive) or negatively (proscriptive). This paper summarizes findings from an experiment testing normative messages and presents evidence for injunctive-proscriptive messages as the most effective route in gaining desired behavior. Under this condition off-trail hiking was less likely to occur, compared to the incidence of off-trail hiking under four other conditions (including a control under which no additional sign was posted). In contrast, the incidence of off-trail hiking was greatest when the descriptive-proscriptive message was used (when compared to three other message types). The injunctive-proscriptive message is most appropriate when a behavior is desired shortly after exposure to a message and may not be most effective when longer-term maintenance of actions is desired.
IN SHORT

The Concept of Authenticity: Implications for Interpretation

Steve Hill
Dept. of Communications, 301C Umberger
Kansas State University
Manhattan, KS 66506-3402
Phone: (785) 532-1140
Fax: (785) 532-5633
shill@ksu.edu

Ted T. Cable
Kansas State University
Assistant Department Head and Professor
Dept of Horticulture, Forestry, and Recreation Resources
Kansas State University
Manhattan, Kansas

Abstract

Although the concept of authenticity has received considerable attention in tourism literature, it has received little in interpretation literature despite its importance to practitioners and administrators involved in planning, marketing, and managing interpretive sites. Interpreters may seek to provide authentic experiences at their sites regardless of whether they are interpreting natural resources or cultural heritage. However, many interpreters may not realize that what constitutes an authentic experience for visitors is difficult to define and that authenticity is a complex concept. A framework showing three key types of authenticity—the objective, the constructed, and the personal—can be applied to interpretive sites. Doing so can help interpretation researchers and practitioners understand the indicators of authentic experiences and to provide authentic interpretive experiences to visitors. In exploring the varying meanings of authenticity for interpretation, we also expand prior analyses of such variation to little-examined issues such as birding, hiking, or other outdoor recreation.

 

National Association for Interpretation | 888-900-8283 | www.interpnet.com