|
Abstracts:
Volume 11, Number 1
2006 |
| RESEARCH |
The
Effect of Thematic Interpretation
on a Child’s Knowledge of
an Interpretive Program
Jennifer L. Tarlton
7303 Myrtle Ave
Eureka, CA 95503
(707) 443-4100
jennhaig@hotmail.com
Carolyn J. Ward
Associate Professor
Environmental and Natural Resource Department
Humboldt State University
(707) 826-5639
carolyn.ward@humboldt.edu
Abstract
In the field of interpretation, thematic interpretation is a widely accepted
technique used to increase knowledge gain from interpretive programs with educational
goals and objectives. Although the approach has theoretical grounding in cognitive
psychology, social psychology, and persuasive communication, it has not been
formally tested in a field interpretive setting. This study addressed this lack
of empirical evidence by comparing children’s knowledge gained from a thematic
versus a non-thematic interpretive program. It also compared type of knowledge
gained by evaluating three different levels of learning: recognition, recall,
and application.
The results supported the use of thematic interpretation and program construction.
The thematic group not only showed a significant increase in ability to recall
and apply information, but was also three times more likely to identify the theme
and main points of the program, when compared with the non-thematic group. No
differences between groups were found for the recognition measure. This indicated
that thematic interpretation is effective at encouraging higher levels of thinking
and learning and highlights the importance of matching correct evaluation measures
with learning objectives. Further management and research implications are discussed.
The Impact of Normative Message Types on Off-Trail Hiking
Patricia L. Winter
Research Social Scientist
United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service
Pacific Southwest Research Station
4955 Canyon Crest Drive
Riverside, California, 92507
phone (951)680-1557
pwinter@fs.fed.us
Abstract
Depreciative activities and high annual visitation levels threaten the health
and sustainability of the giant Sequoia. Signage is one route to managing visitor
behavior. Research suggests a two-by-two conceptualization of normative messages
in signs. Messages may present the “ought” (injunctive) or the “is” (descriptive)
of behavior and may be stated positively (prescriptive) or negatively (proscriptive).
This paper summarizes findings from an experiment testing normative messages
and presents evidence for injunctive-proscriptive messages as the most effective
route in gaining desired behavior. Under this condition off-trail hiking was
less likely to occur, compared to the incidence of off-trail hiking under four
other conditions (including a control under which no additional sign was posted).
In contrast, the incidence of off-trail hiking was greatest when the descriptive-proscriptive
message was used (when compared to three other message types). The injunctive-proscriptive
message is most appropriate when a behavior is desired shortly after exposure
to a message and may not be most effective when longer-term maintenance of actions
is desired. |
| IN
SHORT |
The
Concept of Authenticity: Implications for Interpretation
Steve Hill
Dept. of Communications, 301C Umberger
Kansas State University
Manhattan, KS 66506-3402
Phone: (785) 532-1140
Fax: (785) 532-5633
shill@ksu.edu
Ted T. Cable
Kansas State University
Assistant Department Head and Professor
Dept of Horticulture, Forestry, and Recreation Resources
Kansas State University
Manhattan, Kansas
Abstract
Although the concept of authenticity has received considerable attention in
tourism literature, it has received little in interpretation literature despite
its importance to practitioners and administrators involved in planning, marketing,
and managing interpretive sites. Interpreters may seek to provide authentic
experiences at their sites regardless of whether they are interpreting natural
resources or cultural heritage. However, many interpreters may not realize
that what constitutes an authentic experience for visitors is difficult to
define and that authenticity is a complex concept. A framework showing three
key types of authenticity—the objective, the constructed, and the personal—can
be applied to interpretive sites. Doing so can help interpretation researchers
and practitioners understand the indicators of authentic experiences and to
provide authentic interpretive experiences to visitors. In exploring the varying
meanings of authenticity for interpretation, we also expand prior analyses
of such variation to little-examined issues such as birding, hiking, or other
outdoor recreation.
|
|