|
|
Abstracts:
Volume 9, Number 1
2004 |
| RESEARCH |
The
Effects of Environment-Based Education on Students’ Achievement
Motivation
Julie Athman
Environmental Education Specialist
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Julie_Athman@fws.gov
Martha C. Monroe
Associate Professor
School of Forest Resources and Conservation
University of Florida
Abstract
This mixed-methodology study examined the relationship between environment-based
education and high school students’ achievement motivation. Four hundred
9th- and 12th-grade students from 11 Florida high schools participated in the
study. A Pretest-Posttest Nonequivalent Comparison Group Design (9th grade) and
a Posttest Only Nonequivalent Comparison Group Design (12th grade) were used
in the study. Interviews of students and teachers were used to support and explain
the quantitative data. Data collection took place over the 2001–2002 school
year. When controlling for pretest score, GPA, gender, and ethnicity, environment-based
programs had a positive effect on 9th grade students’ achievement motivation.
When controlling for GPA, gender, and ethnicity, environment-based programs had
a positive effect on 12th-grade students’ achievement motivation. The results
of this study support the use of environment-based education for improving achievement
motivation and can be used to guide future program implementation. Implications
for formal educators, environmental educators, and interpreters are discussed.
Motivations of Volunteer Interpreters in Taiwan
A Survey of Natural Trails Society Volunteers
Yi-Fan Tung
The Pennsylvania State University
Harry C. Zinn
The Pennsylvania State University
Recreation & Park Management Program
201 Mateer Building
University Park, PA
hzinn@psu.edu
Abstract
We surveyed volunteer interpreters in the Natural Trails Society of Taiwan, an
environmental education organization. Seventy-four of the 104 interpreters returned
questionnaires, resulting in a response rate of 71%. We compared the importance
of different motivations, tested for relationships between motivations and volunteer
characteristics, and evaluated motivation items developed specifically for environmental
education volunteers. On average, volunteers attached most importance to enjoying
nature, followed by learning, doing something to benefit nature and society,
religious-spiritual reasons, social contact, achievement, teaching-leading-sharing,
filling an empty nest, and fulfilling social obligations. Volunteers with lower
household incomes attached more importance than others to enjoying nature. Achievement
was more important to those without a college degree than to those with college
degrees. Teaching-leading-sharing was most important to those who were younger,
single, and without children at home. Filling an empty nest was most important
to those without a college degree. Fulfilling social obligations was more important
to males than females. Both learning and teaching-leading-sharing were more important
to those who had been volunteering for two years or less than to those who had
been volunteering longer. The patterns of motivations we found suggest strategies
managers can use to recruit and retain volunteers. Additional research will be
needed to explain why motivations differ between subgroups, compare motivations
across organizations and cultures, and further develop and refine motivation
scales for environmental education volunteers. |
| IN
SHORT |
Book
Review: Interpretive
Planning
Brochu, Lisa. (2003).
The 5-M Model for
Successful Planning Projects. Fort Collins, CO: InterpPress.
Reviewed by Marcella Wells
Consultant, Wells Resources, Inc.
Fort Collins, Colorado
marcellawells@comcast.net
Introduction
Lisa Brochu has written the book that I had hoped to write one day. The book
(153 pages plus glossary and index) is not only a long overdue treatment of
interpretive planning, but is also a catalyst for thinking about the value
and process of interpretation today. Though concise, this book raises the bar
for interpretive planners and for the overall discipline of interpretation. Interpretive
Planning: The 5M Model for Successful Planning Projects is sure to be
useful for planners, interpreters, instructors, and others involved with interpretation.
The first three chapters of this book define and discuss interpretive planning
and provide a useful context for interpretive planning and planners. Chapter
4 provides a synopsis of the planning process followed by five chapters (Chapters
5-9) that address each of the Ms in the 5M model. The final two chapters contain
post-planning considerations (Chapter 10) and plan formatting discussion (Chapter
11). This review highlights some of the gems contained in the book, and offers
a few observations about why it is a much needed catalyst for the profession.
Book Review: Meaningful interpretation: How to
connect hearts and minds to places, objects, and other resources
Larsen, D. L., Ed. (2003).
Fort Washington, PA:
Eastern National.
Reviewed
by Theresa G. Coble
Assistant Professor
Arthur Temple College of Forestry
Stephen F. Austin State University
Nacogdoches, TX
tcoble@sfasu.edu
Introduction
Csikszentmihalyi introduced the concept of flow several decades ago. To him,
flow was the zone where everything “clicks,” the place where our
skills are just sufficient to meet the challenges we face. For interpreters,
the challenges are high. Our visitors bring diverse backgrounds, meanings,
motivations and interests. They value our resources differently. They bring
differing commitments to protecting our resource. Interpreters do experience
flow, at least some of the time. When flow happens an observer might conclude:
when it’s “working” for the interpreter it tends to “work” for
the audience. But what exactly is working?
Meaningful Interpretation is a visually appealing, leather-bound
volume edited by David L. Larsen, training manager for interpretation, education,
partnerships, recreation and conservation at the Stephen T. Mather Training
Center in Harpers Ferry, West Virginia. Meaningful Interpretation fills an
essential need in the ongoing professionalization of interpretation. The
workbook-style text helps interpreters crack the code, solve the mystery
and put the pieces together to realize their dreams of interpretive excellence
and effectiveness.
Processing and Utilizing Counterintuitive Information
in Interpretation and Resource Management: A Case Study
David Matthew Zuefle, Ph.D.
Park and Recreation Management Program
The University of Mississippi
Oxford, Mississippi
zuefle@olemiss.edu
Introduction
Interpreters and other professionals working with the public in natural resource
management settings depend on good information in order to develop effective
communication and education strategies. But what happens when credible information
that challenges some of the dominant assumptions of these professionals becomes
available? The following research project was designed to yield valuable insights
into one group of stakeholders in a wildlife management project in upper Appalachia.
While it met its original goal, the project is also valuable because it serves
as a case study of what happens when empirical data and field observations
are seen as intuitively unappealing. |
| IN
MY OPINION |
Research
in Interpretation: Researcher’s Perspective
Gail A. Vander Stoep, Ph.D.
Department of Community, Agriculture, Recreation and Resource Studies
Michigan State University
East Lansing, Michigan
vanders1@msu.edu
Is Interpretation Research a “Catch 22”?
A “push me, pull me cart.1” Catch-22. The old torture technique
of pulling arms and legs simultaneously. These are the analogies and metaphors
that drift into my interpreter’s brain as I think about research and
interpretation. I wonder why the images have such stress and strain attached
to them when research should and can be an exciting endeavor of exploration,
discovery and problem-solving. In brief, I believe it is due to the conflicting
and contradictory demands often placed on researchers (at least university-based
researchers) when the expectation is that research can be exciting, integrative,
and have multiple benefits and applications. Thus this puzzling dilemma becomes
itself a subject of inquiry. A study would be nice, but my reflections across
nearly 25 years of involvement with interpretation, research, and universities
will suffice for this opinion piece....
In Search of Research
A Plea from the Workshop of a Practical Interpreter
Michael H Glen, FAHI, FTS, FSAScot
Touchstone Heritage Management Consultants
Cruachan, Tayinloan, Tarbert PA29 6XF, Scotland
GlenTigstane@aol.com
Trusty, or just rusty, tools?
When you open up your interpreter’s toolkit, you pick out an enthusiastic
pair of pliers to grip hold of a theme, an explanatory hammer to nail down a
good story, or an inspirational screwdriver to drive home a message. You don’t
often make time to check the effectiveness of these tools or the techniques for
using them. Because you’re busy worrying about what you’re doing,
you park any thoughts about how they’re doing it for you. If you’re
lucky, you meet colleagues who tell you about improved pliers, superior hammers,
or enhanced screwdrivers that research and testing have shown to work better—and
why. You didn’t read the researchers’ reports in the journals and
you’ve forgotten the references to the findings in newsletters. They didn’t
get their message over—and it’s your fault! Or is it...?
Interpretation Isn’t Magic
An Academic’s View on the Role of Research in Teaching Interpretation
Sam
H. Ham, Ph.D.
Professor and Director
Center for International Training & Outreach
Department of Resource Recreation and Tourism
University of Idaho
Moscow, Idaho
sham@uidaho.edu
One of the perplexing things about interpretation from a research
point of view is that we haven’t always agreed on what “interpretive
research” should focus on, even at the most general level. Arguments abound
to this day on what interpretation is, and what its functions and outcomes ought
to be. This perplexity characterized interpretation circles especially in the
early 1960s, and even to this day. Metaphors from metaphysics and magic were
often used to describe interpretation. When we spoke about outcomes, we were
likely to invoke elusive notions like “gleams in the visitor’s eye, “magical
experiences,” “enlightenment,” “awakening,” “appreciation,” “revelation” and “enrichment.” When
we spoke about the inputs of interpretation we conceptualized nameless “gimmicks,” “gadgets,” “tricks,” and “approaches.” But
there was little in these concepts we could sink our teeth into and apply without
the benefit of theory and research....
Research: A Voice of Our Own
A Management Perspective on Research
David L. Larsen
Training Manager, Interpretive Development Program
Stephen T. Mather Training Center
National Park Service
David_Larsen@nps.gov
During my third season, the park conducted an interpretive
study. The staff was skilled (no evidence for that but my memory, intuition,
and the quantity of praise from visitors who liked us) but we fought the research.
We dragged our feet, called meetings in protest, and tried our best to skew the
results in our favor.
I think we were afraid.
We knew we were good and we believed our quality could not be quantified. Because
we were certain the professors and managers could not measure our success, we
were also sure they could use the results against us. We were afraid that research
would end the interpretation we practiced.
The professor got tired of our resistance and gave up.
It was our loss....
Interpretation Research
A Perspective from the Field
Joe Zarki
Chief of Interpretation
Joshua Tree National Park
National Park Service
Department of the Interior
joe_zarki@nps.gov
The recently published Meaningful Interpretation (Larsen, 2003)
contains Tanaka Shozo’s wonderfully poetic observation: “The care
of rivers is not a question of rivers, but of the human heart.” Shozo eloquently
summarizes the challenge that has faced preservationists since the days of John
Muir and Enos Mills. Landscapes (including rivers) and cultural heritage are
protected because people want them that way. As interpreters, we understand that
protection of heritage resources occurs only when people see greater value for
special places and objects in their preserved state, rather than value gained
through development. Interpreters who wish to learn what must be done to ensure
the protection of parks should first look into the human heart and know the people
they seek to motivate. This path leads directly to interpretive research....
|